Where do we get off telling another human being how and what to think? We're not them.
I was reading "Working Preacher" this morning. Working Preacher is a website intended to inspire conversation, provide thought and context for individuals' Church sermons/homilies. This week's commentary was on presenting the Gospel to audiences who have either rejected the concept of organized religion, the concept of Jesus, or, the concept of God. I other words, How do present the Gospel to those for whom the Gospel is foreign?
Well, this commentary achieved its goal with me.
My story: I've been well schooled in concepts relating to God, Jesus, afterlife and religiosity. I know the language well. So well in fact, that its literally written on my soul. For me, and the way my wiring has evolved, it makes sense. Perhaps it can be described as genetics of the soul. My genetics of the soul are deep. At least 100 years deep (from what I know, my family has been associated with Zion Baptist Church for close to 100 years). Is been in the air I've breathed, the food I've eaten, the word's I've spoken and the. words I've heard. Its been in the life I've tried to live. Its been given to me.
But this is not true for everyone. Most of us do in fact live " Lives of quiet desperation", as Henry David Thorough might say. And in that living, that human experience there a 8 million ways of looking for something. If we're alive, what we have in common is looking for a path to experience life. Many experience life through the senses of trauma where varieties of trauma has shaped their existence. When those of us who have lived hundreds of years through the senses of religiosity speak to those who've lived 100 of years through the senses of trauma without reprieve, relief or hope are we speaking in language that is understood?
The changes in our world are colossal and daily. It would be fair to say that in discussing concepts related to religiosity, particularly where Christianity is concerned, to audiences where unfamiliarity reigns, the existence of Jesus can't easily be explained. The concepts of the virgin birth, the resurrection, the ascension, are complicated. How do we explain them: "Jesus Saves". Really?? What if I don't need saving? What am I being saved from? " No one enters the Kingdom, but through me". What Kingdom? Why do I want to enter the Kingdom? "The Kingdom of God is at hand". Is that a fact. I can't see it.
If I were not well schooled in the "art" of religiosity, would any of this make sense, or be compelling to me? Yes I may be looking for changes in my life. Yes, I may be looking for hope. Yes I may be looking for a guidepost. And, in the moment, some of this may be the remedy I need. But what about the endurance required for the long run? For me, if I'm unschooled in matters of religiosity or faith, I don't hear attractive arguments. Is this even a good place to start. Let's talk about God. Who, What, Where, is God? In the words of astronomer Neil DeGrasse Tyson: "I don't see evidence".
The continued use of language such as "sin", "resurrection", and "being saved", language that is at least 2000 years old is of questionable value in a day when there is "no evidence" that these terms are related to God. Religion is a complicated matter to be contextualized for understanding. Two-thousand year old language does not contextualize or connect ancient events to present day living. Maybe the language we're looking for is different. Maybe, we're past the time when spoken language adds relevance to the words. Maybe its time for us to realize that spoken language has always underrepresented the words. Maybe its time for us to realize that Actions do that!!
No comments:
Post a Comment